Showing posts with label Art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Art. Show all posts

Thursday, May 2, 2013

Why American modern art blows British talent out of the water


Watch out Tracey Emin and Damien Hirst: Jasper Johns, Robert Rauschenberg and Roy Lichtenstein are coming to galleries in the UK and their ideas are bold and breathtakingly original



American art shines forth in Britain this spring. Great American artists roll through top London galleries like hotshots on the freeway leaving double-decker buses full of British artists far behind. These guys are the real greats. Works by Jasper Johns and Robert Rauschenberg are at the Barbican, showing a freedom of thought that is breathtaking. Johns puts a cast of a foot on the inside of a box's hinged lid, with a layer of sand beneath it, so the foot leaves an impression as accurate yet fragile as a memory: the work is called Memory Piece. Meanwhile, Rauschenberg has made, in collaboration with John Cage, a print of a car's tyre track (Cage drove the car). At the Gagosian gallery, you can see his Jammers, dream-sails of coloured fabric that seem to float like dancers.





But wait, speeding round the bend comes Roy Lichtenstein, replying to these freeform improvisers with sharp, cool one-liners in his retrospective at Tate Modern. This quintessential creator of 60s pop is in London at the same time as the 50s experiments of Johns and Rauschenberg. That is a double measure of first-rate Americana. If you need a chaser, try the National Gallery's exhibition of Frederic Church, one of the founders of American painting in the 19th century.





This great American spring in art could not be more timely: anti-American feeling has reached a pitch among Britons that damages our own cultural life. We speak the same language as the US - even though Spanish is obviously a rival tongue there - and that, plus such shared artistic and literary heroes as John Singer Sargent, Henry James, TS Eliot and David Hockney, has always ensured a deep connection with American culture.





Today, the power of US popular culture is as vast as ever, but what is harder to acknowledge is the originality and quality of serious American high art and its profound contribution to modern thought. Evidence? The fact that no American has won a recent Nobel prize for literature is perhaps the most glaring and debated symptom of a refusal by today's wider world to revere American creative giants.





It is not hard to say why Europeans are less reverent towards the great American artists than we used to be. The catastrophe of the Iraq war left all kinds of scars. But, if we in Britain ignore America's outstanding contribution to modern culture, we risk vanishing into a nostalgic cul-de-sac. In the 80s and 90s, British novelists admired and emulated the modern American novel. Today's fashionable British novels are far less American and far more inward-looking. There has perhaps never been a more exclusively British Booker winner than Hilary Mantel: her fictional version of Tudor Britain owes nothing to Philip Roth, that's for sure. I prefer British writers who are open to American influence, such as David Mitchell.





In a different way, the very British modern art of Tracey Emin or Damien Hirst earns mileage from the fact that people don't know enough about a giant such as Rauschenberg. Indeed, Emin's bed was a rehash of a work by Rauschenberg. The same American giant was using stuffed animals to hilarious, provocative effect in his art decades before Hirst pickled a shark.





The wave of major American art now sweeping over Britain should make us wake up and smell the coffee. There are more things in modern art than Emin ever dreamed of. And a lot of them were born in the USA.


Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Shooting Challenge: Dual Sparkler Exposures


Shooting Challenge: Dual Sparkler Exposures


We've done long exposures. And many of you have blown things up with fireworks. For this week's Shooting Challenge, we're combining the ideas in a technique that looks hard but anyone can pull off.


The Challenge


Take a dual-exposure photo with a sparkler implying motion.


The Technique


So here's how it works. Long exposures are great for light painting, but they leave your figure all blurry and undefined. Meanwhile, flash photography can isolate a subject in a dark room, but that's kind of ugly on its own.



As explained in the above video, you'll lock your camera on a tripod and take two shots: First, have a subject do something with a sparkler in their hand or attached to an object (safely, of course). It can be mundane, like putting away dishes, or really sporty, like swinging a baseball bat. Take a long (3-ish-second) exposure shot of that.



Then, put the sparkler away. Have your subject do the exact same thing, with your camera in the exact same spot, and take a photo of normal length. If you're in a dark environment, and you may want to be to exacerbate the sparkler effect, you'll probably need to use flash to capture your subject frozen in motion.



After that, combine the two images in post production. You'll probably just want to layer the sparks on top and erase everything else from the image, but I could imagine doing some interesting things with layering if you have the Photoshop talent.



To make the photos pop, keep in mind, the sparkler is almost like a speed line, or a means to trace out the motion or path of the figure. It doesn't need to line up 1:1 to work, but it should be related.


The Example


Our lead shot is from Dave Lehl, who also created the great little tutorial you see here. I can almost guarantee, his friends skateboard better than your friends. So don't let anyone get hurt trying all this X-games crap. Mundane can be cool in its own way. (via petapixel)


The Rules


0. No watermarks. They're so ugly.
1. Submissions need to be your own.
2. Photos must be taken since this contest was announced.
3. Explain, briefly, the equipment, settings, technique and story behind shot.
4. Email submissions to contests@gizmodo.com, not me.
5. Include 970px wide image (200KB or less) AND a native resolution sized shot in email.
6. One submission per person.
7. Use the proper SUBJECT line in your email (more info on that below)
8. You agree to the Standard Contest Rules - though we DO accept non-US resident submissions.
9. If the image contains any material or elements that are not owned by you and/or which are subject to the rights of third parties, and/or if any persons appear in the image, you are responsible for obtaining, prior to submission of the photograph, any and all releases and consents necessary to permit the exhibition and use of the image in the manner set forth in these rules without additional compensation. If any person appearing in any image is under the age of majority in their state/province/territory of residence the signature of a parent or legal guardian is required on each release.



Send your best photo by Monday, February 11th at 10AM Eastern to contests@gizmodo.com with "Spark" in the subject line. Save your files as JPGs, and use a FirstnameLastnameSpark.jpg (970px wide) and FirstnameLastnameSparkWallpaper.jpg (2560px wide) naming conventions. Include your shooting summary (camera, lens, ISO, etc) in the body of the email along with a story of the shot in a few sentences. And don't skip this story part because it's often the most enjoyable part for us all beyond the shot itself!




Saturday, March 16, 2013

New miniature gardens Steve Wine

New miniature gardens Steve Wine


Post about the work of Steve Wines, an artist who creates miniature gardens in normal road bumps. In addition to herbs and other plants, it adds to the installation of a variety of miniature objects like chairs, bats, and that makes the work more approximate to their real counterparts.




























Tuesday, December 4, 2012

This Is What Thinking Nothing Looks Like


If you've ever wondered what thinking about nothing looks like, here it is. It's the result of an experiment by artist Gustav Metzger, who hooked himself up to a robotic carving machine—while thinking long and hard about absolutely nothing.



The machine takes EEG signals—essentially the electrical signals from the brain, measured through the scalp—and then uses them to dictate the patterns it cuts into a piece of Portland Stone. The result's rather beautiful, and itself looks like some kind of abstract artwork depicting a human brain. The sculpture is on display at the Work Gallery in London until February. [Design Week]